Clinical Inquiries

How effective are opioids for chronic low back pain?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER:

Short-term (<4 months) treatment with opioids provides modest relief of chronic low back pain, but only minimal improvement in function compared with placebo (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, systematic review of lower-quality randomized controlled trials [RCTs]).

Tramadol isn’t superior to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for pain relief (SOR: A, consistent results from RCTs). In addition, oxycodone with titrated morphine isn’t better than naproxen for relieving pain or improving function (SOR: C, a low-quality RCT).

Although no long-term RCTs have been done, cohort studies have shown that 6 to 12 months of opioid use is associated with a small decrease in pain and either very minimal improvement in, or worsening of, disability (SOR: B, prospective cohort trials).

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 RCTs with a total enrollment of 5540 assessed the efficacy of opioids in adults with chronic low back pain of at least 12 weeks’ duration.1 Five low-quality studies (1378 patients) that compared tramadol with placebo found tramadol to be moderately superior to placebo for relieving pain (standard mean difference [SMD]= -0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.66 to -0.44) but only modestly better for improving function (SMD= −0.18; 95% CI, -0.29 to -0.07).

Six trials with 1887 patients compared strong opioids (morphine, hydromorphone, oxycodone, oxymorphone, and tapentadol) with placebo. The opioids were better than placebo for improving pain (SMD= -0.43; 95% CI, -0.52 to -0.33) and function (SMD= -0.26; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.15). The general interpretation of SMD effect size is 0.2=small, 0.5=medium, 0.8=large. In this case, larger negative numbers correlate with greater improvement.

How opioids stack up against NSAIDs

Two separate double-blind, double-dummy studies randomized adults with low back pain of at least 12 weeks’ duration to receive celecoxib 200 mg twice daily (404 and 398 patients, respectively) or tramadol 50 mg 4 times daily (392 and 404 patients, respectively) for 6 weeks.2 The primary outcome measure was at least a 30% improvement in pain using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) scale. In both studies, more patients taking celecoxib had positive responses than patients taking tramadol (63% vs 50%, P<.001, and 64% vs 55%, P<.008, respectively).

Pages

Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network

Recommended Reading

VIDEO: Primary care is pain care’s front line
MDedge Family Medicine
Nocturnal back pain suggests systemic disorder
MDedge Family Medicine
New shingles vaccine delivers whopping efficacy
MDedge Family Medicine
Federal plan emphasizes heroin/opioid treatment over incarceration
MDedge Family Medicine
Sexual abuse history may promote migraine transformation
MDedge Family Medicine
Zeroing in on the cause of your patient's facial pain
MDedge Family Medicine
Fibromyalgia • anxiety/depression • urinary retention • Dx?
MDedge Family Medicine
Tailor chronic pain interventions to your patient’s clinical profile
MDedge Family Medicine
Hydroxyurea boosts O2 saturations in children with sickle cell disease
MDedge Family Medicine
Nipple Raynaud’s can freeze out breastfeeding desire
MDedge Family Medicine